Net/Net Considerations between Corporate Liable (CL) and Individual Liable (IL) for Wireless Carrier Contract

Net/Net Considerations between Corporate Liable (CL) and Individual Liable (IL) for Wireless Carrier Contract

Attributes of Corporate Liable (CL) plans:
• Overall Control of carrier(s) contract(s)
o Development of RFP
o Carrier bid requests
o Evaluating vendors
o Negotiating carrier contracts
The above should lead to:
• Bulk Purchasing discount opportunity plus new devices every 18-24 months
• Pooling of minutes
• Improved Security across enterprise (Corporate control)
• Asset Protection and ownership…It is likely not beneficial to your enterprise for the telephone numbers your client’s are conditioned to call, to be owned by former employees (IL scenario)
• Consistent ownership and management control of Mobility Policy
• Corporate control of which devices are allowed on enterprise network
• Corporate control setting criteria and billing for optional services (downloads)
• Corporate contracts can save 20% and more
• Once contract is negotiated and optimized ongoing corporate control through Wireless Expense Management (WEM) outsourcing/out tasking could be considered
• WEM solutions can provide automation, centralization and visibility into wireless usage, trends, and spend, while expediting procurement, help desk services, bill pay processes, optimization and cost avoidance services.

Attributes of Individual Liable (IL) plans:
Advantage may occur if corporate policy requires the employee to pay for a large portion of the monthly recurring and equipment charges. In this way the business may mitigate gains otherwise realized by pooling, volume negotiated contracts, ETF waivers, equipment/device/accessory and feature discount offsets under the CL model.
• IL usually makes sense when only a few employees have mobile devices
• Employee enjoys full selection of available devices
• Financial risk and burden on the individual
• User reimbursement plan and methodology usually required
• Limited Mobility Policy oversight
• Security risk less controls
• Generally more expensive
Other important issues and thoughts to consider:
• CL combined with wireless expense management (WEM) solutions will provide automation, centralization and visibility into wireless usage, trends, and spend, while expediting procurement, help desk services, bill pay processes, optimization and cost avoidance services.
• Optimizing pooling plans will minimize your cost per device while maximizing your device usage, super-sizing your savings potential. Combining Wireless Expense Management (WEM) cost avoidance/optimization with cost/time efficiencies will produce significantly better results than the $30 per device savings described in the scenario above.
• Corporate control of your cell phones/smartphones/wireless devices. It is likely not beneficial to your enterprise for the telephone numbers your client’s are conditioned to call, leaving with former employees (IL scenario).
• A centralized corporate policy and an automated approval of all wireless assets will permit only devices into corporate inventory that are useful to your employees and commensurate with their roles and responsibilities.
• Better carrier or WEM Help Desk support providing time/cost efficiencies not received by the IL customer who will have to remain on the phone to resolve the issues on which they require assistance.
• Possible security issues. An IL device connected to the corporate network will be monitored and managed by either your WEM solution provider or internal IT. Without CL corporate control, the device will not be approved for access to the company network. The concern is the employee owns the wireless equipment/smart phone/cell phone; however, the company has ownership of all required corporate data and applications. Proprietary info and protecting corporate network infrastructure will be increasingly difficult exasperated by numerous IL users possibly given such critical access.
Our analysis concludes:
CL places the load of wireless management on the company’s shoulders. However, that is really the only disadvantage. For the CL program to be truly cost effective, it needs to be managed either with internal resources utilizing an automated WEM solution or outsourced to a WEM solution provider. Centralization and automation of the life-cycle management of your wireless assets is critical to the cost/usage/time optimization and efficiency required to provide maximum savings ensuring the Corporate Liable advantage.
As information is power, the advantage can be yours. For global clients of ours the CL advantage makes sense for their telecom team. Corporate Liable is likely an authentic key to your company’s telecom cost reduction strategies.
About Profiles Advisory Group:
Profiles Advisory Group is a consultancy specializing in global telecommunications sourcing, procurement and contract negotiations. Our primary focus includes global WAN, wireless, wireline, audio/video conferencing services. Each client scenario is unique, determined by current services, technology needs, contract cycle, pricing, terms and conditions. Our industry expert resources deliver market leading rates, terms and conditions for clients. Clients benefit from years of insider experience which is put to work on their behalf. Services that we offer include:
• Assessment and Benchmark
• Technology review of existing and planned for services
• Sole source negotiation
• RFP demand set creation
• Multi carrier RFP development, bid review and evaluation
• Negotiate contract terms and conditions
• Wireless Optimization
• Telecommunications Expense Management (TEM) RFP selection process
www.profilesag.com

Profile AG believes The Yankee Group gets it right on AT&T T Mobile merger…saying “NO”.

This is additional follow up on AT&T wireless and T-Mobile’s proposed merger. We still believe it to be anti-competitive and only self serving to AT&T and Verizon Wireless. It creates a duopoly that the consumers and businesses will regret for many years to come. Choices are paramount to keeping mobility options competitive for technology as…

Continue Reading »

Wireless Management and Procurement for Medium sized Businesses

As our engagements expand within the Wireless management and procurement efforts, we are seeing a common thread throughout most companies. Mobility is a major area of concern for controlling expenses in all organizations today. Many medium size businesses are allowing employees to use their personal smartphones and tablets for work-related purposes because of enormous benefits…

Continue Reading »

Thoughts around Global Mobility Sourcing RFP’s

Global Mobility Sourcing/RFP considerations Our client engagement experiences as well as true global carrier readiness have led us to the following list of considerations and concerns about the current chances for a successful Global Mobility RFP and procurement initiative. Here are our considerations that should influence an approach to this challenging process. Creation of a…

Continue Reading »

Update on antitrust probe of AT&T, T-Mobile (posted, 4/02/2011)

Investigation is expected to intensify as realization that 80% of US wireless would be shared by 2 carriers… AT&T Wireless and Verizon Wireless. AT&T’s leaderships opinion that this somehow protects our national interests is questionable. This $39 Billion dollar acquisition delivers much more than that for AT&T and Verizon. Our opinion is that this creates…

Continue Reading »

HOW TO SELECT BEST IN CLASS TEM and or WIRELESS/MOBILITY EXPENSE MANAGEMENT PARTNER

Gartner predicts that 80% of enterprises will overspend on wireless services through 2014. With that factoid, you would be wise to get a grip on mobility spending. The sooner you get mobility spending under control, the more you save and the greater your advantage. More clients seeking assistance with selecting Wireless/Mobility Expense Management and TEM…

Continue Reading »

Wireless Contract Negotitions…Choosing the right partner

The wireless carriers benefit greatly from clients who cannot find the necessary time to analyze, evaluate and optimize the constantly changing needs within their ongoing wireless spend. Clients commonly over- pay for “unused” minute’s as well “overage” minutes. Add the current complexity of rapidly expanding data plans and these costs across an enterprise-wide spend quickly…

Continue Reading »

Telecom Contract Negotiations…The Business Case to Out Task

Telecom Contract Negotiations…The Business Case to Out Task …Considered Out-Tasking the Sourcing, Procurement and Contract Negotiation of Global Enterprise Network Services? …Gartner’s report claimed Companies leave 15-20% of potential additional savings on the negotiating table when professional negotiating teams are not used. That’s $150,000-$200,000 per million dollars spent annually. We see that and more in…

Continue Reading »

AT&T aquisition of T-Mobile USA

AT&T to acquire T-Mobile USA AT&T is looking to acquire T-Mobile in a $39bn deal. This will mean 80% of AT&T revenues will be derived from wireless services. Is this setting the stage for the duopoly of the wireless services providers? What is the future for Sprint? Does it feel like “back to the future”…

Continue Reading »

Buyer beware – Evaluate pros and cons of bundling wireless and wireline agreements

Evaluate pros and cons of bundling wireless and wire line contracts before executing a new telecommunication agreement. Evaluating whether or not to bundle a wire line services contract with a wireless services contract requires careful consideration. As with any telecommunications contract you must ask yourself what is in it for my organization. Remember carriers always…

Continue Reading »